by goldsilver.com
A great deal of ink has been spilled recently about the economic meltdown in Cyprus. The latest domino in the slow collapse of the European monetary union, Cyprus introduced radical solutions to meet the demands of the EU (European Union) and International Monetary Fund (IMF). Now, Cypriot bank depositors have lost chunks of their savings, the Cyprus government has imposed currency controls, and the central bank may be forced to sell the majority of its gold reserves. In some ways, however, the Cypriots are receiving a better deal than citizens of the U.S., U.K., or Canada.
The Cyprus bank crisis is intimately tied to that of Greece. Due to rising unemployment and benefit payments, the volume of state debt – much of which is funded through Greek loans – steeply increased during the recession. In order to fund the loans, Cypriot banks bought Greek bonds. As a result of the Greek bailout settlement, the bonds suffered a 50% haircut, in turn threatening the collapse of the Cypriot banking sector.
Looking for the Lab Economics? Get all information & latest update on Economics. Find the best Economics information updating blog today.
Showing posts with label Euro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Euro. Show all posts
Friday, May 3, 2013
Cyprus Bailout Deal Is Pilot Program for Future Bank Deposit Confiscation
Etichette:
BANKING CRISIS,
banks,
ECB,
Euro,
EURO CRISIS,
Federal Reserve,
FINANCE EDUCATION,
FINANCIAL ADVICE,
FINANCIAL CRISIS,
financial education,
FINANCIAL PLANNING,
IMF
Tuesday, January 1, 2013
What causes hyperinflations and why we have not seen one yet: A forensic examination of dead currencies
by mises.ca
As anticipated in my previous letter, today I want to discuss the topic of high or hyperinflation: What triggers it? Is there a common feature in hyperinflations that would allow us to see one when it’s coming? If so, can we make an educated guess as to when to expect it? The analysis will be inductive (breaking with the Austrian method) and in the process, I will seek to help Peter Schiff find an easy answer to give the media whenever he’s questioned about hyperinflation. If my thesis is correct, three additional conclusions should hold: a) High inflation and high nominal interest rates are not incompatible but go together: There cannot be hyperinflation without high nominal interest rates, b) The folks at the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee will eventually be out of a job, and c) Jim Rogers will have been proved wrong on his recommendation to buy farmland.
(Before we deal with these questions, a quick note related to my last letter: A friend pointed me to this article in Zerohedge.com, where the problem on liquidity being diverted back to shareholders in the form of share buybacks and dividends was exposed, before I would bring it up, on my letter of March 4th. )
A forensic analysis on dead currencies
When I think of hyperinflation, I think of dead currencies. They are the best evidence. There is a common pattern to be found in every one of them and no, I am not talking of six-to-eight-figure denomination bills or shortages of goods. These are just symptoms. Behind the death of every currency in modern times, there has been a quasi-fiscal deficit causing it. Thus, briefly, when someone asks: What causes hyperinflations? The answer is: Quasi-fiscal deficits! Why have we not seen hyperinflation yet? Because we have not had quasi-fiscal deficits!What is a quasi-fiscal deficit?
A quasi-fiscal deficit is the deficit of a central bank. From Germany to Argentina to Zimbabwe, the hyper or high inflationary processes have always been fueled by such deficits. Monetized fiscal deficits produce inflation. Quasi-fiscal deficits (by definition, they are monetized) produce hyperinflation. Remember that capital losses due to the mark down of assets do not affect central banks: They simply don’t need to mark to market. They mark to model.
Etichette:
Austrian School,
Central Bank Policy,
ECB,
Euro,
FED,
Gold and Silver,
hyperinflations,
Inflation,
Jim Rogers
Saturday, December 22, 2012
What is wrong about the euro, and what is not
Every Monday morning the readers of the UK’s Daily Telegraph
are treated to a sermon on the benefits of Keynesian stimulus
economics, the dangers of belt-tightening and the unnecessary cruelty of
‘austerity’ imposed on Europe by the evil Hun. To this effect, the
newspaper gives a whole page in its ‘Business’ section to Roger Bootle and Ambrose Evans-Pritchard,
who explain that growth comes from government deficits and from the
central bank printing money, and why can’t those stupid Europeans get
it? The reader is left with the impression that, if only the European
states could each have their little currencies back and merrily devalue
and run some proper deficits again, Greece could be the economic
powerhouse it was before the Germans took over.
Ambrose
Evans-Pritchard (AEP) increasingly faces the risk of running out of
hyperbolic war-analogies sooner than the euro collapses. For months he
has been numbing his readership with references to the Second World War
or the First World War, or to ‘1930s-style policies’ so that not even
the most casual reader on his way to the sports pages can be left in any
doubt as to how bad this whole thing in Europe is, and how bad it will
get, and importantly, who is responsible. From declining car sales in
France to high youth-unemployment in Spain, everything is, according to
AEP, the fault of Germany, a ‘foolish’ Germany. Apparently these nations
had previously well-managed and dynamic economies but have now sadly
fallen under the spell of Angela Merkel’s Thatcherite belief in
balancing the books and her particularly Teutonic brand of fiscal
sadism.
Etichette:
Central Bank Policy,
collapse,
Debt,
deflation,
Detlev Schlichter,
ECB,
Euro,
European Union,
FED,
Inflation
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)