By Alasdair Macleod
Governments have refused to accept the necessity of a period of
economic re-adjustment following the credit-bubble. The bubble burst
about five years ago and economic progress has been effectively
suspended ever since. The consequences of this refusal to accept reality
are at a minimum to make this adjustment unnecessarily drawn out and
needlessly painful, without offering a better eventual outcome.
Reduced to its bare bones, the choice has been either to accept that
unviable businesses and over-extended banks must go bust, or to ignore
the problem and hope it goes away. We are familiar with this dilemma as
investors: a business that refuses to adapt to new realities will
eventually fail. Before it does, its investors have the chance either to
sell their shares and perhaps reinvest their money more profitably, or
to refuse to accept an early loss on their investment. Most of us, being
human, take the latter course and usually regret it.
Looking for the Lab Economics? Get all information & latest update on Economics. Find the best Economics information updating blog today.
Showing posts with label banking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label banking. Show all posts
Friday, February 22, 2013
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
What gives money value, and is fractional-reserve banking fraud?
By Detlev Schlichter
I thought I should address a couple of points that I consider to be misconceptions and that frequently come up in discussions with the audience or other speakers when I present my views on the fundamental problems with fiat money. I am not always in a position to correct these misconceptions right then. They are often woven into questions on other points and I have to leave them uncommented so as not to disrupt the flow of the debate. My book is, I believe, quite clear on these points, so I could simply refer people to Paper Money Collapse. But, for whatever reason, it is still the case that many in my audience make inferences from similar arguments to my own, and I fear that some of the differences between these positions might get overlooked. These differences are not unimportant, and I think it is worthwhile to highlight and clarify them.
The first point is related to the question what gives money its value? The second point is the question of whether fractional-reserve banking is fraudulent, and should be banned on the basis of property rights.
Let’s first restate the central premise of Paper Money Collapse. The main message is that today’s mainstream views on money are flawed. The most important difference between commodity money, such as a proper gold standard, and ‘paper money’,
Etichette:
banking,
Ben Bernanke,
Bretton Woods,
Central Banks European,
Central Planning,
Money Collapse
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
The Trends to Watch in 2013
Rather than attempt to predict the unpredictable – that is, specific events and price levels – let’s look instead for key dynamics that will play out over the next two to three years. Though the specific timelines of crises are inherently unpredictable, it is still useful to understand the eventual consequences of influential trends.
In other words: policies that appear to have been successful for the past four years may continue to appear successful for a year or two longer. But that very success comes at a steep, and as yet unpaid, price in suppressed systemic risk, cost, and consequence.
Trend #1: Central Planning intervention in stock and bond markets will continue, despite diminishing returns on Central State/Bank intervention
Etichette:
banking,
banks,
central banks,
Central Planning,
Charles Hugh Smith,
Debt,
FED,
Federal Reserve,
GDP,
growth,
income,
Japan,
Keynesianism,
Manipulation,
Markets,
QE4,
Quantitative Easing,
recovery
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)